Cookies, chaos and Chrome: The industry’s spiciest takes on Google’s reckoning
Digiday sifted through the noise to bring you the sharpest, spiciest and most side-eye worthy takes out there.

Now that the dust has settled from Google’s gut punch — being called out not just for monopolizing how people access information online but how that information is monetized — the hot takes are flying. In the absence of straight answers, the industry has done what it does best: speculate. Digiday sifted through the noise to bring you the sharpest, spiciest and most side-eye-worthy takes out there.
Google’s U-turn on third-party cookies was not part of the plan
It would be easy to chalk up Google’s every move (or lack thereof) since announcing the death of third-party cookies to a master plan. But this much is clear: The reversal wasn’t some Machiavellian scheme. It was a scramble that was drawn out over years. Extended deadlines, shifting strategies for its own third-party cookie alternatives, to even the move to offload the decision onto Chrome users — every step made the chaos impossible to hide. Along the way, the real challenge came into sharp focus. Google Chrome was trying to do two fundamentally opposing things at once: protect user privacy and preserve ad performance. It took a while, but Google finally realized it and called time on its five-year crusade.
“Google’s decision to stall cookie deprecation doesn’t feel like a product timeline delay — it feels like a strategic calculation,” said Ravi Patel, CEO and co-founder of media platform SWYM.ai. “With the antitrust case looming and the real possibility they’ll have to dismantle parts of their ad business, this move preserves what they can while they still can. If GAM or other core parts of the stack come under fire, holding onto the signal advantage in Chrome becomes a lifeline.”
Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.